Information for the connected business professional
Header image

A recent TMCNet article, “Posting problems: Social Web sites create issues for employers, employees” discusses the ongoing battle employers face as their workers stream onto social media websites like Facebook and Twitter.

But a more complex issue is employees posting things from home, not realizing the multitude of people they might be sharing the info with. The dilemma of “off-duty conduct” is classically addressed with a confidentiality agreement, guarding employees from sharing proprietary company information. But if an update from a employee conflicts with the company’s image, it’s time for that employer to begin to develop policies to understand and deal with social media issues.

At the same time, to those of you tweeting away at work: be thoughtful, considerate, and follow a old maxim regarding most things: “don’t post anything you wouldn’t want your mother to read.” While many firms encourage social collaboration, do so professionally.

The SSN Take: Keep it simple – don’t befriend your co-workers, and never, ever, your boss, on social networking sites.

Samuel Hartman, March 17, 2010

Note: Post not sponsored.

I think the question isn’t “Should Your Company Have a Social Media Policy? as Mashable.com recently asked, but more precisely what should be “in” the social media policy?

We are so far past the question for needing policy around social media guidelines. It is here, it is happening and it is impactful – whether we want to face up to it or not. So let’s dig deeper than should it exist and look more closely at what should it contain.

In their article, Mashable.com addresses the 5 W’s of social media policy content: Why, What, Who, Where and When. That is a very good start. But I contend the order may not be priority-based. “When” seems to be first in the need-based ranking. When is the right time to implement a policy? Considering Twitter itself is growing at a 1,382% rate, based on a Nielson Online study from February 2009 to February 2010, the time is now.

Where do you start in establishing guidelines and policy around social media? And even more important, where do you start the education? Formal policies can drive effective business practices, not just police abuse of social media. When set up properly and sufficient training around the appropriate and beneficial uses of social media is provided to staff, employees can begin to use this innovative and immediate tool to reach out to customers in a whole new way. The author uses Zappo’s as an example. They train their staff during new-hire orientation on the proper use of Twitter. They don’t start with the rules of what they can’t do, but actually show them the best way to use a social media platform as part of their responsibilities. The result is a personal connection between management and staff, and between staff and the customer.

Who should use social media? It isn’t just for marketing as once believed. Customer service, shipping, and research and development find positive uses for social media on a daily basis that not only benefits their work, helps to achieve their goals, and ultimately increases the bottom dollar, but also makes the experience for the consumer richer and more rewarding. As a result of this positive experience, they become a return customer; the prize of all prizes.

Social media has become a respected form of communication and in some markets, an expected form of communication. It is no longer an afterthought but an integral part of a good communication plan. Building policy and guidelines for social media use will only add to the effectiveness of that communication plan.

Melody K. Smith, March 9, 2010

Note: Post not sponsored.

Social networking tripled in the past year and physicians are not immune to the epidemic. One professional survey says that 34 percent of doctors are using social media. “The lure of social media is strong,” writes Dr. Arthur R. Derse, M.D., in amednews.com article “Social media consults may harbor dangers.”

“This past year was marked by a new intersection of medicine and social media, with surgeries tweeted live (with patient permission) by surgeons and medical centers.” Gathering advice via social media from a widespread panel of medical experts can benefit patients, but it also has dangers. Despite best intentions to keep electronic communication private, confidential information can be one errant keystroke or one determined hacker away from going, as they say, viral. Before using social media, weigh what is to be gained over normal on-the-scene or phone consultation, or email to a specific consultant, says Dr. Derse. “Any consideration . . . should begin with the tweetable Hippocratic aphorism, ‘First, do no harm.’”

John Sniffen, March 3, 2010

Note: Post not sponsored.

If you work on Wall Street or are affected by investment regulations, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has created new guidelines that give your firm Big Brother-like powers over your social networking. A recent Arstechnica.com article, ”Brokers must think twice before tweeting, Facebooking,” uses Facebook as a model for how your communication might be overseen. It states that static elements of a Facebook page, such as a personal profile, will be screened before posting. However, the treatment of dynamic parts of a page that display conversation, like Facebook’s wall, will have even greater implications. These interactions may be considered “public appearance.” The big question becomes how will your firm sort out the professional from the personal. FINRA’s “we know it when we see it” approach suggests that your employer will have great interpretive leeway. A safe solution for brokers is to make sure all online communications meet the old and new rules for giving financial advice.

David Thimme, Feb. 26, 2010

Note: Post not sponsored.

It seems common-sense enough: using someone’s online profile as a screen for potential employment. After all, if the information is public, what’s the harm? But a recent Star Tribune article, “HR and Facebook: It’s complicated,” discusses employers coming dangerous close to violating anti-discrimination laws if they use what they find to deny employment to someone. While discrimination by race, gender, or religion is clearly illegal, other legal activities like drinking or union organizing should not enter into the decision-making process, even though they may be “undesirable.” Some companies use a third party to obtain information legally about the candidates. Still, social savvy job seekers: be careful what you leave visible online. Consider a personal and professional Facebook page, or use LinkedIn exclusively for professional contacts. In the age of social media, companies need to tactfully sift through the information legally, while employees should keep the personal online profiles private.

Sam Hartman, Feb. 21, 2010

Note: Post not sponsored.

In “3 New Ways to Measure the Social Web,” some new techniques are discussed that are outrunning the traditional “pageview tracking” analytic model so many of us grew up with. Many sites are browsed today without so much as a page refresh, making individual pageviews a thing of the past. Funnel Analysis, or “measuring conversion rates,” allows developers to track bottlenecks in the user-flow process, be it sign-up, adding friends, or searching. By targeting retention rates on specific areas of your site, you can see how “sticky” an app or feature really is. Social networks are all about community, and communities rely on repeated interaction. Regardless of the method used, find the analytics that help to get sales and customer interaction; too much data can sometimes overwhelm and blur the focus of your team.

Wrap-up: Focusing on good customer interaction and conversation will ultimately reward your social media campaign, regardless of the analytic results.

Sam Hartman, Feb. 19, 2010

Note: Post not sponsored.

Compliance rules for financial advisers are vast and strict, designed to disallow self-promotion yet permit offering sound advice to customers and potential investors. But how does this play out in the landscape of social media? The answer should be easy: follow the same rules and use the new medium to “share ideas, educate, respond, and expand financial and investment knowledge.” The quote from the Investment News article seems simple enough – use the same common-sense policies that the advisors follow now.

But the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. (Finra) has been mulling over the issue for months and plans on releasing a new set of compliance policies in March. Some of the current guidelines touch on e-mail sales literature (if sent to more than 25 prospective customers), public appearances (chat rooms), and advertisements (publicly available web sites of registered personnel). Check out SocialWare’s Finra article for more info.

Sam Hartman, Feb. 18, 2010

Note: Post not sponsored.

Be smart with your postings, a recent PCWorld article urges social network users. The story claims 53 percent of employers polled use sites like Facebook to get background information on job applicants. In addition, 28 percent of those employers also claimed to have fired an employee due to content on a social networking page. Whether you are a job-hunter or an employee intent on keeping a job, the article recommends people, “make sure you are using this resource to your advantage by conveying a professional image and underscoring your qualifications”. Something as simple as removing questionable posts and photos is a wise idea that may help you land that next job or keep one during this uncertain economic time.

Patrick Roland, Feb. 16, 2010

Note: Post was not sponsored.

A recent Chameleon Associates article attempts to define do’s and don’ts of online life. The lengthy piece lays out many unspoken and possibly unknown rules of handling digital etiquette in the twenty-first century. From proper places to report spam, to effectively communicating on social networking sites, to avoiding malware, to safe filesharing, to noticing signs of an infected computer, to properly caring for your laptop and more, this is a big step in defining how responsible people interact with the online world in the computer age. Since many companies have guidelines for conduct but realize the internet is so vast they could never catalogue the highlights, this could be a useful document in corporate settings. This clearly written, focused article is perfect for setting expectations and advising employees of proper online behavior. 

Patrick Roland, Feb. 10, 2010

Note:   Post was not sponsored.

While it is tempting to use social networking outlets like Facebook and MySpace as your personal bullhorn to the world, use that power carefully, a recent Careerbuilder.co.uk report recommends. (http://www.siliconrepublic.com/news/article/14897/cio/job-seekers-screened-online and http://topnews.net.nz/content/21766-employers-might-research-prospective-employee-social-networking-sites-careerbuilder). Over half the employers polled claimed they used online sources to perform informal background checks on potential employees. Many reported they did not hire a candidate when they found questionable photos, posts about abusing alcohol and drugs, discriminatory marks, and bashing former employers on their pages.

Fortunately, these employers also reportedly discovered positive qualities, such as the professional legitimacy of their resume, strong communication skills, and overall personality, on social networking sites that did lead to a hire. So the answer for job seekers is simple: make your social media page advertise your positive qualities and you might just have a leg up on the competition.

Patrick Roland, Feb. 2, 2010

Note: Post not sponsored.